ZAPPING ON THE FARM

“…a growing number of farmers are zapping themselves to cure illnesses such as Ross River Virus by using their own electric fences! It all started when a farmer in Bunbury, in southwestern Australia was accidentally pinned by a young bull against a 7,500 volt electric fence. The farmer had contracted Ross River Virus several months earlier, as confirmed by blood tests, but his symptoms and all traces of his virus completely disappeared since his encounter with his fence.

Two weeks later, a workmate, also diagnosed with Ross River virus decided to purposely try the same treatment. HIS symptoms also disappeared as well!

(Nexus, Aug-Sept 1996)

ALIVE OR DEAD

Dr. G.H. Earp-Thomas, a noted soil scientist, who worked early in this century, theorized that all dead bodies are acid and negative electrically, and all living people/animals are alkaline and positive electrically.

Using the blood electrification works to add positive electricity to the body, and therefore probably helps to alkalinize it as well.

STRUCK BY LIGHTNING

There are authenticated records from several decades ago describing an older man who was struck by lighting, survived, and subsequently grew a third set of teeth and a bushy new head of dark hair. His grossly metastasized, inoperable cancers completely vanished. He threw away his glasses and his cane.

SHOCKING TREATMENT PROPOSED FOR AIDS

Zapping the AIDS virus with low voltage electric current can completely eliminate its ability to infect human white blood cells cultured in the laboratory, reports a team at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City.

William D. Lyman and his colleagues found that exposure to 50-100 microamperes of electricity, comparable to that produced by a cardiac pacemaker, reduced the infectivity of the AIDS virus by 100 percent.

Their experiments described March 14 in Washington, DC at the first International Symposium on Combination Therapies, showed that the shocked viruses lost their ability to make an enzyme crucial to their reproductive cycle and could no longer cause the white cells to clump together, two key signs of the viral infection.

EXTREMELY SMALL, SAFE AMOUNTS OF ELECTRICITY (A FEW THOUSANDTHS OF AN AMPERE) HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE BEYOND THE TOLERANCE LEVEL OF PATHOGENIC LIFE FORMS; AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO KILL OR DEVITALIZE HIV, HERPES, TUBERCULOSIS, HEPATITIS, COLDS, FLU, AND OTHER VIRUSES, FUNGI, PARASITES, AND BACTERIA IN BLOOD AND BODY FLUID RENDERING THEM INEFFECTIVE TO INFECT OR AFFECT NORMAL HEALTHY CELLS, WHILE MAINTAINING THE BIOLOGICAL USEFULNESS OF THE BLOOD AND OTHER BODY FLUIDS.

DOCTORS AT ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE IN NEW YORK CITY HAVE PROVEN THAT MINUTE ELECTRICAL CURRENTS RENDER INEFFECTIVE ANY BACTERIUM, VIRUS, FUNGUS OR PARASITE WITHOUT HARM TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUID; THE DOCTORS REPORT THAT THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY USED IS NO MORE THAN TWO THOUSANDTHS OF AN AMPERE; HOWEVER, THEY WILL NOT BE PREPARED TO TEST 'IN VIVO' (I.E. IN THE BODY)  TECHNIQUES FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

INDEPENDENT SCIENTISTS AND RESEARCHERS HAVE PROVEN HOWEVER, THAT 'IN VIVO' (IN THE BODY) ELECTRO-MEDICAL TECHNIQUES ARE NOT ONLY SAFE FOR HUMANS, BUT WORK QUITE THOROUGHLY ON SYSTEMIC INFECTIONS WITHOUT INVASIVE SURGICAL IMPLANTS OR EXPENSIVE HOSPITAL CARE.

Several recent U.S. and international patent documents report that extremely small amounts of electricity are beyond the tolerance level of microbial life. These electrical forces have been proven to kill or devitalize bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites in blood and body fluids without adverse effect to normal healthy cells and/or the biological usefulness of the blood or body fluids.

U.S. patent 05188738 granted in 1993 and held by the Albert Einstein Medical Centre doctors mentioned above, describes an 'in vitro' (i.e. outside the body) apparatus for removing blood from one arm, electrifying it and returning it pathogen free to the other arm in a process similar to dialysis. The patent also describes a proposed 'in vivo' (in the body) technology as a surgically implanted, battery operated device similar to a heart pacemaker.

Dr. Steven Kaali, one of the patent holders claims their 'in vivo' (in the body) device will take years of testing before it is ready even though no harmful side effects or pathogenic mutation have been indicated. Critically-ill persons who have exhausted pharmaceutical therapies meanwhile fight for their lives without the knowledge that electro-medical therapies exist and may very well help them.

Scientists, MD's and individual researchers working independently report that their 'in vivo' (in the body) techniques are completely safe and highly effective. However, the United States' Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued warnings that they would be prosecuted for making any beneficial claims about the technology.

The FDA and the American Medical Association (AMA) have put a strangle-hold on the efficacy and safety information gathered over recent years by numerous scientists, researchers and medical practitioners even though reportedly, AMAZING results have been achieved on humans with their 'in vivo' (in the body) techniques. The threat of jail and license suspension looms constantly over them as 'in vivo' human-testing has never been approved.

According to scientist Bob Beck D.Sc. who has his doctorate in science and who is responsible for designing two simple 'in vivo' blood electrification techniques, many HIV / Aids patients using his modalities have reached undetectable viral counts (as proven by Polymerase Chain Reaction -PCR-testing) at between 4-8 weeks of two hour per day therapy; still he says, he is constantly threatened by authorities.

He is perhaps the most vocal critic of an alleged pharmaceutically-based conspiracy to cover up and discredit the electro-medical movement.

Records indicate that in the 1930's the Flexnor Report declared the use of electricity in medicine quackery; conveniently ushering in the new antibiotic "wonder-drug" age. At the time, 10,000 medical practitioners in America alone, believed in and practiced electro-medicine. They were forced to stop or loose their licenses to practice.

In the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (a Hearst newspaper) article A Shocking Remedy written in 1993, the now principal investigator at Bastyr University Dr. Leanna Standish said "We're at a very exciting juncture in medical history, we're starting to look at the human organism as a bioelectric system, not just an anatomical structure. I think it's going to be some years before we know the full ramifications." Standish has her doctorate in Neuroscience.

Modern practitioners were convinced even in 1993 that electricity could be a vital force in curing disease. They sensed that futuristic sounding applications such as reversal of spinal-cord injuries and cures for cancer and aids could be achieved by a new understanding of the body's electrical circuitry. This is not "new age" thinking as records from the 1st Century A.D. described the use of electric eels to relieve pain and cure illness.

As recently as 1997, an Austrian Oncology Society conference 'Quantum Physics in Medicine, The Paradigm of the next Millennium' which was attended by German and Austrian cancer specialists, focused on the integration of bio-electric discoveries and conventional cancer therapies. The conference kicked off with a full introduction to the physics of electro-medicine and its benefits. The conference was a giant step forward in the integration of electro-medicine into conventional medicine.

What was around the corner at the time of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer article (1993), may be here today. One bio-electric web site claims "only time will tell if daily, long term (90-120 day) electro-medical combination therapy has killed HIV infections completely (in effect curing the patients completely) or if intermittent treatments will be necessary to keep the infections at undetectable levels in brain, blood, body fluid, bone marrow and tissues." The attitude among all electro-medical researchers is entirely positive, they claim that approved or not, they have seen a remarkably small rate of failure.

It is claimed by practitioners of electric-combination therapy, that even under the worst HIV scenarios, with viral counts over 1 million copies per ml and severe physical deterioration present, these synergistic therapies produce a sharp, nearly immediate drop in viral load with a corresponding rebound in immune system function.

Another proponent took the stance that should HIV remain hidden away in places that are unreachable by electro-magnetics (in this case powerful electro-magnetic pulsing), being HIV or Hepatitis positive, may in the long run be more of an annoyance than a life threatening disease. They went on to say that with periodic self treatments the viruses should remain undetectable. Theoretically they say, viral levels would be so low with the electric combination therapies, that the patients may very well be proven to be non-contagious, though still technically HIV or Hepatitis positive.

It is widely reported by practitioners, that certain electro-medical therapies work quickly at greatly reducing the severity and frequency of herpes outbreaks; with some long-term chronic sufferers experiencing complete remission.

A common thread among all electro-medical practitioners is that the treatments are completely safe and appear to stimulate the immune system, thereby heightening immune response to all invaders. So do electrical treatments kill off the diseases directly allowing the immune system to revive, or does heightened immune system response kill off the invading organisms? They say it appears a mixture of both, although apparently no one really knows for sure, as yet.

If in the end its found that electro-medical therapies are proven superior over conventional pharmaceutically based therapies for microbial infections, we will certainly be headed for what can only be called a 'medical revolution', one which understandably will not be well received by the pharmaceutical industry.

Two of the only books in print on the subject of electro-medicine are; The Cancer Cure That Worked: Fifty Years of Suppression: by Barry Lynes, and Dr. Robert Becker's The Body Electric, they are both well written and researched. The first book by Lynes centers around the life of Raymond Rife and his electrical frequency "cure" for cancer.

The therapy was tested thoroughly and successfully by the University of Southern California in the 1930's. The second, by Dr. Becker (he is a medical doctor in the U.S.) about the latest discoveries and use of electricity in medicine. Some of the uses like nerve, bone and limb regeneration, though sounding very futuristic, have actually been accomplished.

Bzzzzzzz!

A person told us about his severe allergy to bee stings. He was out fro a walk where he accidentally disrupted a bee hive. He ran for home, knowing he was going to die, getting repeatedly stung by the bees. He wasn’t watching where he was going, and ran into an electric fence. Much to his amazement, he got up and found no evidence of the bee stings at all! He had no harmful effects from the bee stings.

Hssssss!

In a letter to the editor of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, July 26, 1986, p229, we find the following article entitled HIGH VOLTAGE SHOCK TREATMENT FOR SNAKE BITE.

The mainstay of treatment of a person bitten by a venomous insect or reptile is to give anti-venom as soon as possible. However, the serum needed may not be available in remote areas of the world. In Ecuador, high voltage - low current electric shocks have proved very successful. In the eastern Amazon jungles of Ecuador 4% of deaths are caused by snake bites. 45% of the Waoroni tribe have been bitten by a snake and 50% of adult males will be bitten more than once. Most of the bites in Ecuador are from snakes identified by Dr. Giovanni Onores (Catholic University, Quito) as Bothrops atrox, B bileneatus, B nasutus, B schlegelei, B castelnaudi, and Lachesis muta. The idea of using an electrical current for treating venomous bites arose from a report in a local paper in Illinois, USA, of a farmer who was hyper-allergic to bee stings and who found that applying a high voltage, low amperage, direct current shock to the site of his bee stings prevented his usual severe reactions. For snake bites a 20-25 kV, <1 mA direct current is applied to the site of the bite. The bitten area (usually a limb) is electrically grounded as close to the site as possible and current is applied via an insulated probe to the bite for 1-2s. Usually four or five shocks are given with 5-10s between them.

An outboard motor is one commonly available source of such current. A lead carrying an insulated probe can be attached to a spark plug, and the current is best applied with the engine at half-throttle. Other motors with spark plugs (eg, lawnmowers and auxiliary lighting plants) have also been used with excellent results. We have records on 34 cases of bites on limbs where there was evidence of penetration of the skin.

The current was applied within 30 min, and 10-15 min later all pain had gone and the usual sequelae of an untreated bite (swelling, serosanguinous bullae, bleeding, shock, and renal failure) did not develop. No patient died. After an hour the patient was usually able to go home. At follow-up there was no necrosis of tissue around the bite due to the bite or treatment. 7 people who refused the shock treatment experienced the classic complications and 2 needed life-saving amputations. 2 other patients were not treated until 2 hours after being bitten by viper snakes (B atrox and L muta) and they arrived with swollen limbs and intense pain; 1 had signs of spontaneous bleeding.

Seven electrical treatments were given, producing pain relief in 30 min; 12 hours later the swellings had not progressed and there were no signs of bleeding. After 3 days the swelling had almost disappeared; however, 1 had a small necrotic area around the bite site. This technique has been used equally successfully by other investigators in the jungles of Ecuador for other types of bite, such as those of the ant (Paraponera sp). Colleagues in Irian Jaya, Indonesia, and Peru have also used this technique with similar results. Moving towards a more portable system for this treatment, we have modified a 5 x 13 cm unit, popularly known as a "stun gun", with a 9 V battery to deliver a direct pulsating current of around 25 kV and less than 1 mA. One probe acts as a ground terminal while the other applies the current to the bite. Such currents do not stimulate myocardial muscle. The biological basis of this treatment is unknown.

There may be a local effect on the host tissues or there may be a direct effect on the activity of the venom itself. Venom has a short half-life and a shut-down of local vessels by electrospasm may confine the venom locally long enough for it to become inactive. Whatever the mechanism, this technique is a practicable and potentially life saving procedure.

Hospital Vozandes, Quito, Ecuador Ronald H. Guderian Wolfson Tropical Pathology Unit London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London WCIE 7H7 Charles D. Mackenzie Department of Microbiology and Public Health Michigan State University, USA Jeffrey F. Williams Raaatttttle!!!!

The electroshock treatment is among the newer methods reported at achieving reasonable success in bite treatment. This is not yet considered traditional even though the earliest reports of application date quite some time back. These were not United States based field experiences and were thus less likely to end up as being counted as having moved through the time tested process of being considered traditional first aid. Still, the potentials for successful first aid reported in this area have been quite impressive.

The book may continue to be open on this matter, but the approach itself, like the others, may present a contribution to an overall process that seeks out the best results. In this approach, the direct application of electric current to the bite locale is the central focus. Various presentations deliver this shock in different manners.

The theory seems to rest in the basis of a very high voltage thrust at a very low amperage. Now, it is evident that whenever the application of electricity to live tissue is involved, there are some strong considerations to keep in mind. Just how much voltage is high enough?

What is low amperage?

Where and how often is this applied? These are serious questions and all need to be played out to establish some base line formulas for treatment. Research is still underway seeking to outline these parameters. Some people foolishly assume that since electricity is so widely utilized in the medical field for a very wide range of treatment and testing purposes, it surely cannot be that complicated to apply the principles to snake bite first aid. Anytime that high voltage, poor field conditions, a dose of frantic panic, severe pain, and the like are a part of the situation, great care should be placed upon decision making to use this technique. Yet, as a method of first aid it has much to offer and cannot be discounted due to the downside characteristics.

The same principles applied to the other methods must be applied here as well.

Generally, it is accepted that DC current is more suitable for the method. This means stay away from electric plug in receptacles in a wall somewhere! The proper current can be obtained from older coil based gasoline engine ignition systems. Things such as outboard motors, lawn mowers, car or jeep engines, and the like have been pressed into service. There are currently small modified versions of the stun gun which are touted as being effective portable units sufficient to deliver the necessary shock. The idea is to hit the area with enough voltage to damage the cellular molecules of the venom. This must be accomplished at the same time that low enough amps are used to prevent tissue burning, organ damage, convulsions, and a host of other possibilities being experienced from uncontrolled voltage. This is definitely a precision approach with seeing to it that proper safeguards are being maintained. Past successes have reported that voltage in the 100K level coupled with amps at the 1 or 2 level seem to be workable. The bite area is tapped quickly in one second bursts of six or seven spots in a circular fashion around the wound.

Earlier taps are closer in an effort to logically reach venom before it spreads farther out. As time in minutes progresses and swelling or other symptoms move outward, the electric taps move outward also. It has been reported that beginning immediately with the bite itself in time, a series of taps every 10 to 15 minutes for the first hour may work to reduce the impact of the venom. It should be obvious that having ready access to such a shock source is a central feature of this approach. To expend hours seeking out or building a power source is not practical. The idea in all treatments is to respond to the presence of the poison very rapidly! The sooner some can be removed, or in the case of this latter treatment, be damaged in some way, the less likely the onset or the lower the peak of some of the more negative symptoms. It is widely held that the shock properly accomplished has the direct effect of changing the shape of the venom cell such that the adhering quality to whole blood cells is reduced, thereby rendering at least a portion of the venom less able to produce the designed results. As a first aid tool, this approach also must be coupled with safe transport to competent medical service. Additionally, antiseptic procedures should be applied throughout as practical. The history of this approach is more limited but it certainly makes up for late ground by holding the most dramatic claims for rapid success in treatment with minimal resulting damage levels. This method requires a deeper investigative effort and such a continuing study is supported with great hope by those who have experienced the pain of a bite with all of the negatives associated with other treatment courses.