Dental Detox

Subject: Re: Mercury (Hg) Detox

Someone sent this to me off list, and I am responding here since the email this person sends me has no complete "reply to" or "from" fields when it is a response to a rife post I have made. Sorry about the slight off topic.

Someone said that you may know of the various modalities (Rife Frequencies, Ozone Therapy, Beck Cleansing, Clark Zapper, etc.) that have been successful with detoxing from Amalgam (Dental Mercury)

Don't know how to do it electronically, but someone said he had a liver reaction (typically solvents removed) by using a zapper with handholds against the hips.

My recommendations for mercury removal are the metal removal recommendations from my web page, reprinted below.

To change a zapper's frequency, use a potentiometer as the frequency resistor - explained in Zapper Tips on my web page - and some reprinted below metals regimen.

============================================= Metals =================================================
Solaray Cal-Mag Citrate
Alpha lipoic acid
Enzymatic Therapy Doctor's Choice multivitamin
Zinc gluconate
Fiber, Solaray Tetracleanse, homeopathic mercury treatment, N-acetylcysteine, cilantro.
============================================= Metals =================================================

Mercury and other metals in the mouth can be a significant factor in some diseases and is the hardest cleanup since it is expensive and time-consuming to replace. I would definitely perform this cleanup, however, if I had a chronic neurological or muscular disorder. Although Clark finds that the additives to gold fillings and caps can cause problems, they are definitely less hazardous than mercury amalgams.

If I did not have a specific problem with this, I would merely just never have another bit of mercury put into my mouth, and replace the amalgams with non-hazardous material as they aged.

Other cleanups like ceasing use of metal pots, pans, eating and cooking utensils, and avoiding jewelry is easy to do in comparison to avoiding the mercury in one's mouth or the copper and possibly lead and other metals coming from one's plumbing, so this regimen concentrates on these metals.

There are ways to minimize the damage from mercury and other heavy metals in the meantime. The first is to eat an adequate amount of fiber. An apple a day is prudent since the pectin is good at binding metals before they can be absorbed. So are fiber sources such as oatmeal, flax seeds, and many vegetables. A good fiber supplement which is reasonably priced and contains excellent cleansing herbs with fiber is Solaray Tetracleanse. As with any psyllium product, take Tetracleanse with vitamin C to detox possible molds. Vitamin C is always helpful for cleansing. Take 3g or so per day.

Selenium is thought to bind mercury and other metals, and it is a good idea to ensure that one is getting 200 mcg daily, as in a high potency multivitamin like Twinlab Daily One or Enzymatic Therapy Doctor's Choice. Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) helps the body eject metals such as mercury, and is thought to remove solvents, too. Zinc might also assist in this regard, and probably helps removes metallic copper from the body, so one should get at least 100% RDA, as in a multivitamin, and take an extra 50mg per day for a month or more. Magnesium and calcium assist removal of metals from the body and taking something like Solaray Cal-Mag Citrate or other citrate or amino acid chelate. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is probably the best amino acid for removing metals from the body, and like ALA, a good antioxidant.

There are a few homeopathics which supposedly help the body remove metals, but I have never tried them. I would if I had acute problems with heavy metals like mercury and could not immediately have them removed from my mouth. Consuming copious amounts of cilantro is reported by one alternative mercury researcher are being effective in removing mercury, and is likely helpful for other metals.

For those with serious illness caused by metals, the most expeditious route to removing metals (and possibly some solvents) is intravenous chelation therapy, and the prescription drug Succimer is also proven to remove lead and mercury from the body.


From Zapper Tips:
Advanced Zapping

Some people are having good luck with using zappers which use a higher voltage than the 9V battery. One company is now using an AC converter which powers their zapper to 12V. This is probably more effective than using 9V. 555 chips, and the other components used in construction of zappers, will tolerate up to 15V power supply. This is a good avenue for experimentation. So is using different DC square wave frequencies. Someone with electronics knowledge could easily modify the basic zapper design to incorporate 2 9V batteries (and limit the voltage to 12 or 15V) or 8 1.5 volt batteries, or use an AC/DC converter which provided up to 15V. Plus, using a potentiometer to change R2 and a switch to choose different C1 values to be able to vary the frequency (from, e.g., 7500 to 50000 Hz, or even 1 to 800,000 Hz) has the potential for making a zapper much more effective.

I am having good luck using a zapper which has been modified to produce 12 volts peak (8, 1.5 volt batteries). I have a switch which allows 12 different capacitors (1 pf to 10uf) to be used instead of only 1 (C1). I replaced R2 with three potentiometers in series of 2K, 10K, and 20K with a fixed 1K resistor. I use a high wattage R1 of 220 ohms. This provides frequency modulation from 1/3 to 1,200,000 Hz. It can produce Beck, Clark, or Rife frequencies. I have success treating even acute illness with this setup, using Rife frequencies (generally 600 to 2500 Hz) as well as Clark frequencies (70,000 to 800,000 Hz) to treat ailments in my family. When using copper pipe handholds at low frequencies like Beck's, voltage must be limited or else the device will produce an uncomfortable amount of power, but this lends itself to using less efficient electrodes like TENS pads.

Some think the 30,000 Hz that a zapper produces is less effective that using a lower frequency like 5000 or 10000 Hz for general maladies, saying these lower frequencies "penetrate" the body better. People who follow Rife's work work note that the general frequencies now being used are indeed 5K and 10K, which seem to have systemic effects on body processes, rather than killing microbes directly. While 30K produces more useful harmonics in the body (See Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens) I think there may be as much value to these lower frequencies. In fact, one zapper manufacturer uses only 5K, and says his device has been "certified" by Hulda Clark's son. However, one Rife researcher thinks that a frequency of 5KHz will damage red blood cells if used excessively.

An easy way to experiment with variable frequency would be to use a 20K potentiometer in series with a 1K resistor for R2, and a 220 ohm 1/2 watt resistor for R1. Then, use a 0.06 uf capacitor for C1. This would allow a frequency range of approx 600 to 11000 Hz. Of course, a way to measure the frequency is necessary, and can be accomplished with a multimeter that provides frequency readout, like some high end ones do, or an oscilloscope. It can be done in a one-time operation, by letting the zapper warm up for approx 15 minutes so it will exhibit some frequency stability, then measuring the frequency, and marking the position of this frequency for the potentiometer knob position. This is not exact, but since the zapper will have a non-symettric duty cycle, it will produce a great number of AC frequencies centered about the position, so will likely produce the one of interest (see Electrical and Frequency Effect article for more information.) The main Rife frequencies for treating acute illness are 727, 787, 800, 880. For cancer, they are in the 2000-2200 range. For general body maladies not attributed to acute infection (like arteriosclerosis, gallstones, etc) the 5000 and 10000 Hz frequencies are specified by the people who are studying Rife technology.

Note that these Rife frequencies are specified for use on Rife/Bare field generators and not necessarily with a contact device like a zapper, plus they use an entirely different type of waveform, but I believe there is some value to using these frequencies on a non-symettric, "dirty" wave homemade zapper.

Recently, a Rifer reported that a 90% duty cycle used on a Rife/Bare generator was many times more effective than using the normal 50%. This is another good avenue for experimentation. It could be approximated by using a 15K resistor for R1 and a 2K resistor for R2, for example.